Prepare a short brief
Sector, location, structure being considered and the decision date help us scope the work accurately.
Independent legal review of Iranian counterparties, target companies, and asset portfolios before you commit capital.

Before signing an MoU, joint-venture agreement, or share-purchase contract in Iran, foreign investors need a clear picture of the legal exposure attached to the counterparty and the asset. Our legal due diligence practice combines Iranian corporate lawyers with sanctions-aware international counsel to produce a single report you can take to your board and your bank.
Verification of Companies Registration Office filings, board minutes, shareholding history, and capital changes.
Review of material agreements, supplier contracts, loan covenants, and licensing terms.
Searches across Iranian commercial courts, arbitration centres, and execution offices.
Confirmation that operating licences, environmental permits, and sector approvals are valid and transferable.
Title searches at the National Deeds Office and physical inspection of land and plant.
Cross-checks against OFAC, EU, UK, and UN lists for ultimate beneficial owners and key counterparties.
Each step ends with something you can review before the next one begins. Timing depends on document availability and third-party responses.
Agree the perimeter, materiality thresholds, and confidentiality framework.
Review point: agree the output before moving on.
Structured review of disclosed documents with red-flag tracking.
Review point: agree the output before moving on.
Independent verification through Iranian registries and court systems.
Review point: agree the output before moving on.
Targeted Q&A with the target's legal, finance, and operations leads.
Review point: agree the output before moving on.
Findings report with risk rating and recommended pre-closing conditions.
Review point: agree the output before moving on.
| Area | Your side | Our side |
|---|---|---|
| Objectives | Define the decision you need to make and your constraints | Translate the objective into a written scope and question list |
| Documents | Supply records, authorisations and access to counterparties | Request, organise and flag missing or inconsistent evidence |
| Third parties | Appoint licensed lawyers, auditors or banks where required | Coordinate inputs and keep a shared issues log |
| Decisions | Approve each output and take the final commercial decision | Explain findings, limitations and remaining open questions |
Sector, location, structure being considered and the decision date help us scope the work accurately.
Tell us who approves outputs and who can authorise access to records, sites or counterparties.
Confirm your own compliance position early; we cannot provide sanctions clearance or legal opinions.
Move from heads-of-terms to signing with a defensible legal picture of your Iranian counterparty.
A legal review should distinguish verified facts, management statements and documents that could not be obtained. A clean registry extract alone does not establish that an asset is transferable, a licence survives a change of control, or a beneficial owner is unrestricted. Ask for a findings schedule that connects each material issue to a closing condition, contractual protection or further investigation. Public-record access and document completeness should be stated as limitations, not silently treated as a clean result.
Planning estimates only. Confirm the schedule in the proposal; authority decisions, document availability and bank acceptance may change it.